BCH Merchant Directories Now List 4,300 Bitcoin Cash ...

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot

Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot
Reposting after was mistakenly removed by mods (since resolved - Thanks)
A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important.
For better formatting see https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b
https://preview.redd.it/e8s7dj3ivpq51.png?width=428&format=png&auto=webp&s=5d0463462702637118c7527ebf96e91f4a80b290

Overview

Cosmos

Cosmos is a heterogeneous network of many independent parallel blockchains, each powered by classical BFT consensus algorithms like Tendermint. Developers can easily build custom application specific blockchains, called Zones, through the Cosmos SDK framework. These Zones connect to Hubs, which are specifically designed to connect zones together.
The vision of Cosmos is to have thousands of Zones and Hubs that are Interoperable through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC). Cosmos can also connect to other systems through peg zones, which are specifically designed zones that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Cosmos does not use Sharding with each Zone and Hub being sovereign with their own validator set.
For a more in-depth look at Cosmos and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Cosmos on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Polkadot

Polkadot is a heterogeneous blockchain protocol that connects multiple specialised blockchains into one unified network. It achieves scalability through a sharding infrastructure with multiple blockchains running in parallel, called parachains, that connect to a central chain called the Relay Chain. Developers can easily build custom application specific parachains through the Substrate development framework.
The relay chain validates the state transition of connected parachains, providing shared state across the entire ecosystem. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. This is to ensure that the validity of the entire system can persist, and no individual part is corruptible. The shared state makes it so that the trust assumptions when using parachains are only those of the Relay Chain validator set, and no other. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The hope is to have 100 parachains connect to the relay chain.
For a more in-depth look at Polkadot and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Polkadot on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Avalanche

Avalanche is a platform of platforms, ultimately consisting of thousands of subnets to form a heterogeneous interoperable network of many blockchains, that takes advantage of the revolutionary Avalanche Consensus protocols to provide a secure, globally distributed, interoperable and trustless framework offering unprecedented decentralisation whilst being able to comply with regulatory requirements.
Avalanche allows anyone to create their own tailor-made application specific blockchains, supporting multiple custom virtual machines such as EVM and WASM and written in popular languages like Go (with others coming in the future) rather than lightly used, poorly-understood languages like Solidity. This virtual machine can then be deployed on a custom blockchain network, called a subnet, which consist of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was built with serving financial markets in mind. It has native support for easily creating and trading digital smart assets with complex custom rule sets that define how the asset is handled and traded to ensure regulatory compliance can be met. Interoperability is enabled between blockchains within a subnet as well as between subnets. Like Cosmos and Polkadot, Avalanche is also able to connect to other systems through bridges, through custom virtual machines made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin.
For a more in-depth look at Avalanche and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see here and here
(There's a youtube video with a quick video overview of Avalanche on the medium article - https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b)

Comparison between Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche

A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions. I want to stress that it’s not a case of one platform being the killer of all other platforms, far from it. There won’t be one platform to rule them all, and too often the tribalism has plagued this space. Blockchains are going to completely revolutionise most industries and have a profound effect on the world we know today. It’s still very early in this space with most adoption limited to speculation and trading mainly due to the limitations of Blockchain and current iteration of Ethereum, which all three of these platforms hope to address. For those who just want a quick summary see the image at the bottom of the article. With that said let’s have a look

Scalability

Cosmos

Each Zone and Hub in Cosmos is capable of up to around 1000 transactions per second with bandwidth being the bottleneck in consensus. Cosmos aims to have thousands of Zones and Hubs all connected through IBC. There is no limit on the number of Zones / Hubs that can be created

Polkadot

Parachains in Polkadot are also capable of up to around 1500 transactions per second. A portion of the parachain slots on the Relay Chain will be designated as part of the parathread pool, the performance of a parachain is split between many parathreads offering lower performance and compete amongst themselves in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. The number of parachains is limited by the number of validators on the relay chain, they hope to be able to achieve 100 parachains.

Avalanche

Avalanche is capable of around 4500 transactions per second per subnet, this is based on modest hardware requirements to ensure maximum decentralisation of just 2 CPU cores and 4 GB of Memory and with a validator size of over 2,000 nodes. Performance is CPU-bound and if higher performance is required then more specialised subnets can be created with higher minimum requirements to be able to achieve 10,000 tps+ in a subnet. Avalanche aims to have thousands of subnets (each with multiple virtual machines / blockchains) all interoperable with each other. There is no limit on the number of Subnets that can be created.

Results

All three platforms offer vastly superior performance to the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0. Avalanche with its higher transactions per second, no limit on the number of subnets / blockchains that can be created and the consensus can scale to potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot claims to offer more tps than cosmos, but is limited to the number of parachains (around 100) whereas with Cosmos there is no limit on the number of hubs / zones that can be created. Cosmos is limited to a fairly small validator size of around 200 before performance degrades whereas Polkadot hopes to be able to reach 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit only a small number of validators are assigned to each parachain). Thus Cosmos and Polkadot scores ✅✅
https://preview.redd.it/2o0brllyvpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=8f62bb696ecaafcf6184da005d5fe0129d504518

Decentralisation

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus is limited to around 200 validators before performance starts to degrade. Whilst there is the Cosmos Hub it is one of many hubs in the network and there is no central hub or limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created.

Polkadot

Polkadot has 1000 validators in the relay chain and these are split up into a small number that validate each parachain (minimum of 14). The relay chain is a central point of failure as all parachains connect to it and the number of parachains is limited depending on the number of validators (they hope to achieve 100 parachains). Due to the limited number of parachain slots available, significant sums of DOT will need to be purchased to win an auction to lease the slot for up to 24 months at a time. Thus likely to lead to only those with enough funds to secure a parachain slot. Parathreads are however an alternative for those that require less and more varied performance for those that can’t secure a parachain slot.

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus scan scale to tens of thousands of validators, even potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus through repeated sub-sampling. The more validators, the faster the network becomes as the load is split between them. There are modest hardware requirements so anyone can run a node and there is no limit on the number of subnets / virtual machines that can be created.

Results

Avalanche offers unparalleled decentralisation using its revolutionary consensus protocols that can scale to millions of validators all participating in consensus at the same time. There is no limit to the number of subnets and virtual machines that can be created, and they can be created by anyone for a small fee, it scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is limited to 200 validators but no limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created, which anyone can create and scores ✅✅. Polkadot hopes to accommodate 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit these are split amongst each of the parachains). The number of parachains is limited and maybe cost prohibitive for many and the relay chain is a ultimately a single point of failure. Whilst definitely not saying it’s centralised and it is more decentralised than many others, just in comparison between the three, it scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/ckfamee0wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=c4355f145d821fabf7785e238dbc96a5f5ce2846

Latency

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus used in Cosmos reaches finality within 6 seconds. Cosmos consists of many Zones and Hubs that connect to each other. Communication between 2 zones could pass through many hubs along the way, thus also can contribute to latency times depending on the path taken as explained in part two of the articles on Cosmos. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Polkadot

Polkadot provides a Hybrid consensus protocol consisting of Block producing protocol, BABE, and then a finality gadget called GRANDPA that works to agree on a chain, out of many possible forks, by following some simpler fork choice rule. Rather than voting on every block, instead it reaches agreements on chains. As soon as more than 2/3 of validators attest to a chain containing a certain block, all blocks leading up to that one are finalized at once.
If an invalid block is detected after it has been finalised then the relay chain would need to be reverted along with every parachain. This is particularly important when connecting to external blockchains as those don’t share the state of the relay chain and thus can’t be rolled back. The longer the time period, the more secure the network is, as there is more time for additional checks to be performed and reported but at the expense of finality. Finality is reached within 60 seconds between parachains but for external ecosystems like Ethereum their state obviously can’t be rolled back like a parachain and so finality will need to be much longer (60 minutes was suggested in the whitepaper) and discussed in more detail in part three

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus achieves finality within 3 seconds, with most happening sub 1 second, immutable and completely irreversible. Any subnet can connect directly to another without having to go through multiple hops and any VM can talk to another VM within the same subnet as well as external subnets. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Results

With regards to performance far too much emphasis is just put on tps as a metric, the other equally important metric, if not more important with regards to finance is latency. Throughput measures the amount of data at any given time that it can handle whereas latency is the amount of time it takes to perform an action. It’s pointless saying you can process more transactions per second than VISA when it takes 60 seconds for a transaction to complete. Low latency also greatly increases general usability and customer satisfaction, nowadays everyone expects card payments, online payments to happen instantly. Avalanche achieves the best results scoring ✅✅✅, Cosmos with comes in second with 6 second finality ✅✅ and Polkadot with 60 second finality (which may be 60 minutes for external blockchains) scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/kzup5x42wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=320eb4c25dc4fc0f443a7a2f7ff09567871648cd

Shared Security

Cosmos

Every Zone and Hub in Cosmos has their own validator set and different trust assumptions. Cosmos are researching a shared security model where a Hub can validate the state of connected zones for a fee but not released yet. Once available this will make shared security optional rather than mandatory.

Polkadot

Shared Security is mandatory with Polkadot which uses a Shared State infrastructure between the Relay Chain and all of the connected parachains. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. Every parachain makes the same trust assumptions, and as such the relay chain validates state transition and enables seamless interoperability between them. In return for this benefit, they have to purchase DOT and win an auction for one of the available parachain slots.
However, parachains can’t just rely on the relay chain for their security, they will also need to implement censorship resistance measures and utilise proof of work / proof of stake for each parachain as well as discussed in part three, thus parachains can’t just rely on the security of the relay chain, they need to ensure sybil resistance mechanisms using POW and POS are implemented on the parachain as well.

Avalanche

A subnet in Avalanche consists of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. So unlike in Cosmos where each zone / hub has their own validators, A subnet can validate a single or many virtual machines / blockchains with a single validator set. Shared security is optional

Results

Shared security is mandatory in polkadot and a key design decision in its infrastructure. The relay chain validates the state transition of all connected parachains and thus scores ✅✅✅. Subnets in Avalanche can validate state of either a single or many virtual machines. Each subnet can have their own token and shares a validator set, where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. It scores ✅ ✅. Every Zone and Hub in cosmos has their own validator set / token but research is underway to have the hub validate the state transition of connected zones, but as this is still early in the research phase scores ✅ for now.
https://preview.redd.it/pbgyk3o3wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=61c18e12932a250f5633c40633810d0f64520575

Current Adoption

Cosmos

The Cosmos project started in 2016 with an ICO held in April 2017. There are currently around 50 projects building on the Cosmos SDK with a full list can be seen here and filtering for Cosmos SDK . Not all of the projects will necessarily connect using native cosmos sdk and IBC and some have forked parts of the Cosmos SDK and utilise the tendermint consensus such as Binance Chain but have said they will connect in the future.

Polkadot

The Polkadot project started in 2016 with an ICO held in October 2017. There are currently around 70 projects building on Substrate and a full list can be seen here and filtering for Substrate Based. Like with Cosmos not all projects built using substrate will necessarily connect to Polkadot and parachains or parathreads aren’t currently implemented in either the Live or Test network (Kusama) as of the time of this writing.

Avalanche

Avalanche in comparison started much later with Ava Labs being founded in 2018. Avalanche held it’s ICO in July 2020. Due to lot shorter time it has been in development, the number of projects confirmed are smaller with around 14 projects currently building on Avalanche. Due to the customisability of the platform though, many virtual machines can be used within a subnet making the process incredibly easy to port projects over. As an example, it will launch with the Ethereum Virtual Machine which enables byte for byte compatibility and all the tooling like Metamask, Truffle etc. will work, so projects can easily move over to benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. In the future Cosmos and Substrate virtual machines could be implemented on Avalanche.

Results

Whilst it’s still early for all 3 projects (and the entire blockchain space as a whole), there is currently more projects confirmed to be building on Cosmos and Polkadot, mostly due to their longer time in development. Whilst Cosmos has fewer projects, zones are implemented compared to Polkadot which doesn’t currently have parachains. IBC to connect zones and hubs together is due to launch Q2 2021, thus both score ✅✅✅. Avalanche has been in development for a lot shorter time period, but is launching with an impressive feature set right from the start with ability to create subnets, VMs, assets, NFTs, permissioned and permissionless blockchains, cross chain atomic swaps within a subnet, smart contracts, bridge to Ethereum etc. Applications can easily port over from other platforms and use all the existing tooling such as Metamask / Truffle etc but benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. Currently though just based on the number of projects in comparison it scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/4zpi6s85wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e91ade1a86a5d50f4976f3b23a46e9287b08e373

Enterprise Adoption

Cosmos

Cosmos enables permissioned and permissionless zones which can connect to each other with the ability to have full control over who validates the blockchain. For permissionless zones each zone / hub can have their own token and they are in control who validates.

Polkadot

With polkadot the state transition is performed by a small randomly selected assigned group of validators from the relay chain plus with the possibility that state is rolled back if an invalid transaction of any of the other parachains is found. This may pose a problem for enterprises that need complete control over who performs validation for regulatory reasons. In addition due to the limited number of parachain slots available Enterprises would have to acquire and lock up large amounts of a highly volatile asset (DOT) and have the possibility that they are outbid in future auctions and find they no longer can have their parachain validated and parathreads don’t provide the guaranteed performance requirements for the application to function.

Avalanche

Avalanche enables permissioned and permissionless subnets and complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. For example a subnet can be created where its mandatory that all validators are from a certain legal jurisdiction, or they hold a specific license and regulated by the SEC etc. Subnets are also able to scale to tens of thousands of validators, and even potentially millions of nodes, all participating in consensus so every enterprise can run their own node rather than only a small amount. Enterprises don’t have to hold large amounts of a highly volatile asset, but instead pay a fee in AVAX for the creation of the subnets and blockchains which is burnt.

Results

Avalanche provides the customisability to run private permissioned blockchains as well as permissionless where the enterprise is in control over who validates the blockchain, with the ability to use complex rulesets to meet regulatory compliance, thus scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is also able to run permissioned and permissionless zones / hubs so enterprises have full control over who validates a blockchain and scores ✅✅. Polkadot requires locking up large amounts of a highly volatile asset with the possibility of being outbid by competitors and being unable to run the application if the guaranteed performance is required and having to migrate away. The relay chain validates the state transition and can roll back the parachain should an invalid block be detected on another parachain, thus scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/li5jy6u6wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=e2a95f1f88e5efbcf9e23c789ae0f002c8eb73fc

Interoperability

Cosmos

Cosmos will connect Hubs and Zones together through its IBC protocol (due to release in Q1 2020). Connecting to blockchains outside of the Cosmos ecosystem would either require the connected blockchain to fork their code to implement IBC or more likely a custom “Peg Zone” will be created specific to work with a particular blockchain it’s trying to bridge to such as Ethereum etc. Each Zone and Hub has different trust levels and connectivity between 2 zones can have different trust depending on which path it takes (this is discussed more in this article). Finality time is low at 6 seconds, but depending on the number of hops, this can increase significantly.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s shared state means each parachain that connects shares the same trust assumptions, of the relay chain validators and that if one blockchain needs to be reverted, all of them will need to be reverted. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Finality time between parachains is around 60 seconds, but longer will be needed (initial figures of 60 minutes in the whitepaper) for connecting to external blockchains. Thus limiting the appeal of connecting two external ecosystems together through Polkadot. Polkadot is also limited in the number of Parachain slots available, thus limiting the amount of blockchains that can be bridged. Parathreads could be used for lower performance bridges, but the speed of future blockchains is only going to increase.

Avalanche

A subnet can validate multiple virtual machines / blockchains and all blockchains within a subnet share the same trust assumptions / validator set, enabling cross chain interoperability. Interoperability is also possible between any other subnet, with the hope Avalanche will consist of thousands of subnets. Each subnet may have a different trust level, but as the primary network consists of all validators then this can be used as a source of trust if required. As Avalanche supports many virtual machines, bridges to other ecosystems are created by running the connected virtual machine. There will be an Ethereum bridge using the EVM shortly after mainnet. Finality time is much faster at sub 3 seconds (with most happening under 1 second) with no chance of rolling back so more appealing when connecting to external blockchains.

Results

All 3 systems are able to perform interoperability within their ecosystem and transfer assets as well as data, as well as use bridges to connect to external blockchains. Cosmos has different trust levels between its zones and hubs and can create issues depending on which path it takes and additional latency added. Polkadot provides the same trust assumptions for all connected parachains but has long finality and limited number of parachain slots available. Avalanche provides the same trust assumptions for all blockchains within a subnet, and different trust levels between subnets. However due to the primary network consisting of all validators it can be used for trust. Avalanche also has a much faster finality time with no limitation on the number of blockchains / subnets / bridges that can be created. Overall all three blockchains excel with interoperability within their ecosystem and each score ✅✅.
https://preview.redd.it/ai0bkbq8wpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=3e85ee6a3c4670f388ccea00b0c906c3fb51e415

Tokenomics

Cosmos

The ATOM token is the native token for the Cosmos Hub. It is commonly mistaken by people that think it’s the token used throughout the cosmos ecosystem, whereas it’s just used for one of many hubs in Cosmos, each with their own token. Currently ATOM has little utility as IBC isn’t released and has no connections to other zones / hubs. Once IBC is released zones may prefer to connect to a different hub instead and so ATOM is not used. ATOM isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for ATOM as of the time of this writing is $1 Billion with 203 million circulating supply. Rewards can be earnt through staking to offset the dilution caused by inflation. Delegators can also get slashed and lose a portion of their ATOM should the validator misbehave.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s native token is DOT and it’s used to secure the Relay Chain. Each parachain needs to acquire sufficient DOT to win an auction on an available parachain lease period of up to 24 months at a time. Parathreads have a fixed fee for registration that would realistically be much lower than the cost of acquiring a parachain slot and compete with other parathreads in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. DOT isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for DOT as of the time of this writing is $4.4 Billion with 852 million circulating supply. Delegators can also get slashed and lose their DOT (potentially 100% of their DOT for serious attacks) should the validator misbehave.

Avalanche

AVAX is the native token for the primary network in Avalanche. Every validator of any subnet also has to validate the primary network and stake a minimum of 2000 AVAX. There is no limit to the number of validators like other consensus methods then this can cater for tens of thousands even potentially millions of validators. As every validator validates the primary network, this can be a source of trust for interoperability between subnets as well as connecting to other ecosystems, thus increasing amount of transaction fees of AVAX. There is no slashing in Avalanche, so there is no risk to lose your AVAX when selecting a validator, instead rewards earnt for staking can be slashed should the validator misbehave. Because Avalanche doesn’t have direct slashing, it is technically possible for someone to both stake AND deliver tokens for something like a flash loan, under the invariant that all tokens that are staked are returned, thus being able to make profit with staked tokens outside of staking itself.
There will also be a separate subnet for Athereum which is a ‘spoon,’ or friendly fork, of Ethereum, which benefits from the Avalanche consensus protocol and applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. It’s native token ATH will be airdropped to ETH holders as well as potentially AVAX holders as well. This can be done for other blockchains as well.
Transaction fees on the primary network for all 3 of the blockchains as well as subscription fees for creating a subnet and blockchain are paid in AVAX and are burnt, creating deflationary pressure. AVAX is a fixed capped supply of 720 million tokens, creating scarcity rather than an unlimited supply which continuously increase of tokens at a compounded rate each year like others. Initially there will be 360 tokens minted at Mainnet with vesting periods between 1 and 10 years, with tokens gradually unlocking each quarter. The Circulating supply is 24.5 million AVAX with tokens gradually released each quater. The current market cap of AVAX is around $100 million.

Results

Avalanche’s AVAX with its fixed capped supply, deflationary pressure, very strong utility, potential to receive air drops and low market cap, means it scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot’s DOT also has very strong utility with the need for auctions to acquire parachain slots, but has no deflationary mechanisms, no fixed capped supply and already valued at $3.8 billion, therefore scores ✅✅. Cosmos’s ATOM token is only for the Cosmos Hub, of which there will be many hubs in the ecosystem and has very little utility currently. (this may improve once IBC is released and if Cosmos hub actually becomes the hub that people want to connect to and not something like Binance instead. There is no fixed capped supply and currently valued at $1.1 Billion, so scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/mels7myawpq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=df9782e2c0a4c26b61e462746256bdf83b1fb906
All three are excellent projects and have similarities as well as many differences. Just to reiterate this article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions, you may have different criteria which is important to you, and score them differently. There won’t be one platform to rule them all however, with some uses cases better suited to one platform over another, and it’s not a zero-sum game. Blockchain is going to completely revolutionize industries and the Internet itself. The more projects researching and delivering breakthrough technology the better, each learning from each other and pushing each other to reach that goal earlier. The current market is a tiny speck of what’s in store in terms of value and adoption and it’s going to be exciting to watch it unfold.
https://preview.redd.it/dbb99egcwpq51.png?width=1388&format=png&auto=webp&s=aeb03127dc0dc74d0507328e899db1c7d7fc2879
For more information see the articles below (each with additional sources at the bottom of their articles)
Avalanche, a Revolutionary Consensus Engine and Platform. A Game Changer for Blockchain
Avalanche Consensus, The Biggest Breakthrough since Nakamoto
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One
Cosmos — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two
Cosmos Hub ATOM Token and the commonly misunderstood staking tokens — Part Three
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part One — Overview and Benefits
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Two — How Consensus Works
Polkadot — An Early In-Depth Analysis — Part Three — Limitations and Issues
submitted by xSeq22x to CryptoCurrency [link] [comments]

[ CryptoCurrency ] Comparison between Avalanche, Cosmos and Polkadot

[ 🔴 DELETED 🔴 ] Topic originally posted in CryptoCurrency by xSeq22x [link]
A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important.
For better formatting see https://medium.com/ava-hub/comparison-between-avalanche-cosmos-and-polkadot-a2a98f46c03b
https://preview.redd.it/lg16iwk2dhq51.png?width=428&format=png&auto=webp&s=6c899ee69800dd6c5e2900d8fa83de7a43c57086

Overview

Cosmos

Cosmos is a heterogeneous network of many independent parallel blockchains, each powered by classical BFT consensus algorithms like Tendermint. Developers can easily build custom application specific blockchains, called Zones, through the Cosmos SDK framework. These Zones connect to Hubs, which are specifically designed to connect zones together.
The vision of Cosmos is to have thousands of Zones and Hubs that are Interoperable through the Inter-Blockchain Communication Protocol (IBC). Cosmos can also connect to other systems through peg zones, which are specifically designed zones that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Cosmos does not use Sharding with each Zone and Hub being sovereign with their own validator set.
For a more in-depth look at Cosmos and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
https://youtu.be/Eb8xkDi_PUg

Polkadot

Polkadot is a heterogeneous blockchain protocol that connects multiple specialised blockchains into one unified network. It achieves scalability through a sharding infrastructure with multiple blockchains running in parallel, called parachains, that connect to a central chain called the Relay Chain. Developers can easily build custom application specific parachains through the Substrate development framework.
The relay chain validates the state transition of connected parachains, providing shared state across the entire ecosystem. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. This is to ensure that the validity of the entire system can persist, and no individual part is corruptible. The shared state makes it so that the trust assumptions when using parachains are only those of the Relay Chain validator set, and no other. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. The hope is to have 100 parachains connect to the relay chain.
For a more in-depth look at Polkadot and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see my three part series — Part One, Part Two, Part Three
https://youtu.be/_-k0xkooSlA

Avalanche

Avalanche is a platform of platforms, ultimately consisting of thousands of subnets to form a heterogeneous interoperable network of many blockchains, that takes advantage of the revolutionary Avalanche Consensus protocols to provide a secure, globally distributed, interoperable and trustless framework offering unprecedented decentralisation whilst being able to comply with regulatory requirements.
Avalanche allows anyone to create their own tailor-made application specific blockchains, supporting multiple custom virtual machines such as EVM and WASM and written in popular languages like Go (with others coming in the future) rather than lightly used, poorly-understood languages like Solidity. This virtual machine can then be deployed on a custom blockchain network, called a subnet, which consist of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance.
Avalanche was built with serving financial markets in mind. It has native support for easily creating and trading digital smart assets with complex custom rule sets that define how the asset is handled and traded to ensure regulatory compliance can be met. Interoperability is enabled between blockchains within a subnet as well as between subnets. Like Cosmos and Polkadot, Avalanche is also able to connect to other systems through bridges, through custom virtual machines made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin.
For a more in-depth look at Avalanche and provide more reference to points made in this article, please see here and here
https://youtu.be/mWBzFmzzBAg

Comparison between Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche

A frequent question I see being asked is how Cosmos, Polkadot and Avalanche compare? Whilst there are similarities there are also a lot of differences. This article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions. I want to stress that it’s not a case of one platform being the killer of all other platforms, far from it. There won’t be one platform to rule them all, and too often the tribalism has plagued this space. Blockchains are going to completely revolutionise most industries and have a profound effect on the world we know today. It’s still very early in this space with most adoption limited to speculation and trading mainly due to the limitations of Blockchain and current iteration of Ethereum, which all three of these platforms hope to address. For those who just want a quick summary see the image at the bottom of the article. With that said let’s have a look

Scalability

Cosmos

Each Zone and Hub in Cosmos is capable of up to around 1000 transactions per second with bandwidth being the bottleneck in consensus. Cosmos aims to have thousands of Zones and Hubs all connected through IBC. There is no limit on the number of Zones / Hubs that can be created

Polkadot

Parachains in Polkadot are also capable of up to around 1500 transactions per second. A portion of the parachain slots on the Relay Chain will be designated as part of the parathread pool, the performance of a parachain is split between many parathreads offering lower performance and compete amongst themselves in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. The number of parachains is limited by the number of validators on the relay chain, they hope to be able to achieve 100 parachains.

Avalanche

Avalanche is capable of around 4500 transactions per second per subnet, this is based on modest hardware requirements to ensure maximum decentralisation of just 2 CPU cores and 4 GB of Memory and with a validator size of over 2,000 nodes. Performance is CPU-bound and if higher performance is required then more specialised subnets can be created with higher minimum requirements to be able to achieve 10,000 tps+ in a subnet. Avalanche aims to have thousands of subnets (each with multiple virtual machines / blockchains) all interoperable with each other. There is no limit on the number of Subnets that can be created.

Results

All three platforms offer vastly superior performance to the likes of Bitcoin and Ethereum 1.0. Avalanche with its higher transactions per second, no limit on the number of subnets / blockchains that can be created and the consensus can scale to potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot claims to offer more tps than cosmos, but is limited to the number of parachains (around 100) whereas with Cosmos there is no limit on the number of hubs / zones that can be created. Cosmos is limited to a fairly small validator size of around 200 before performance degrades whereas Polkadot hopes to be able to reach 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit only a small number of validators are assigned to each parachain). Thus Cosmos and Polkadot scores ✅✅
https://preview.redd.it/ththwq5qdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=92f75152c90d984911db88ed174ebf3a147ca70d

Decentralisation

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus is limited to around 200 validators before performance starts to degrade. Whilst there is the Cosmos Hub it is one of many hubs in the network and there is no central hub or limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created.

Polkadot

Polkadot has 1000 validators in the relay chain and these are split up into a small number that validate each parachain (minimum of 14). The relay chain is a central point of failure as all parachains connect to it and the number of parachains is limited depending on the number of validators (they hope to achieve 100 parachains). Due to the limited number of parachain slots available, significant sums of DOT will need to be purchased to win an auction to lease the slot for up to 24 months at a time. Thus likely to lead to only those with enough funds to secure a parachain slot. Parathreads are however an alternative for those that require less and more varied performance for those that can’t secure a parachain slot.

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus scan scale to tens of thousands of validators, even potentially millions of validators all participating in consensus through repeated sub-sampling. The more validators, the faster the network becomes as the load is split between them. There are modest hardware requirements so anyone can run a node and there is no limit on the number of subnets / virtual machines that can be created.

Results

Avalanche offers unparalleled decentralisation using its revolutionary consensus protocols that can scale to millions of validators all participating in consensus at the same time. There is no limit to the number of subnets and virtual machines that can be created, and they can be created by anyone for a small fee, it scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is limited to 200 validators but no limit on the number of zones / hubs that can be created, which anyone can create and scores ✅✅. Polkadot hopes to accommodate 1000 validators in the relay chain (albeit these are split amongst each of the parachains). The number of parachains is limited and maybe cost prohibitive for many and the relay chain is a ultimately a single point of failure. Whilst definitely not saying it’s centralised and it is more decentralised than many others, just in comparison between the three, it scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/lv2h7g9sdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=56eada6e8c72dbb4406d7c5377ad15608bcc730e

Latency

Cosmos

Tendermint consensus used in Cosmos reaches finality within 6 seconds. Cosmos consists of many Zones and Hubs that connect to each other. Communication between 2 zones could pass through many hubs along the way, thus also can contribute to latency times depending on the path taken as explained in part two of the articles on Cosmos. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Polkadot

Polkadot provides a Hybrid consensus protocol consisting of Block producing protocol, BABE, and then a finality gadget called GRANDPA that works to agree on a chain, out of many possible forks, by following some simpler fork choice rule. Rather than voting on every block, instead it reaches agreements on chains. As soon as more than 2/3 of validators attest to a chain containing a certain block, all blocks leading up to that one are finalized at once.
If an invalid block is detected after it has been finalised then the relay chain would need to be reverted along with every parachain. This is particularly important when connecting to external blockchains as those don’t share the state of the relay chain and thus can’t be rolled back. The longer the time period, the more secure the network is, as there is more time for additional checks to be performed and reported but at the expense of finality. Finality is reached within 60 seconds between parachains but for external ecosystems like Ethereum their state obviously can’t be rolled back like a parachain and so finality will need to be much longer (60 minutes was suggested in the whitepaper) and discussed in more detail in part three

Avalanche

Avalanche consensus achieves finality within 3 seconds, with most happening sub 1 second, immutable and completely irreversible. Any subnet can connect directly to another without having to go through multiple hops and any VM can talk to another VM within the same subnet as well as external subnets. It doesn’t need to wait for an extended period of time with risk of rollbacks.

Results

With regards to performance far too much emphasis is just put on tps as a metric, the other equally important metric, if not more important with regards to finance is latency. Throughput measures the amount of data at any given time that it can handle whereas latency is the amount of time it takes to perform an action. It’s pointless saying you can process more transactions per second than VISA when it takes 60 seconds for a transaction to complete. Low latency also greatly increases general usability and customer satisfaction, nowadays everyone expects card payments, online payments to happen instantly. Avalanche achieves the best results scoring ✅✅✅, Cosmos with comes in second with 6 second finality ✅✅ and Polkadot with 60 second finality (which may be 60 minutes for external blockchains) scores ✅
https://preview.redd.it/qe8e5ltudhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=18a2866104590f81a818690337f9121161dda890

Shared Security

Cosmos

Every Zone and Hub in Cosmos has their own validator set and different trust assumptions. Cosmos are researching a shared security model where a Hub can validate the state of connected zones for a fee but not released yet. Once available this will make shared security optional rather than mandatory.

Polkadot

Shared Security is mandatory with Polkadot which uses a Shared State infrastructure between the Relay Chain and all of the connected parachains. If the Relay Chain must revert for any reason, then all of the parachains would also revert. Every parachain makes the same trust assumptions, and as such the relay chain validates state transition and enables seamless interoperability between them. In return for this benefit, they have to purchase DOT and win an auction for one of the available parachain slots.
However, parachains can’t just rely on the relay chain for their security, they will also need to implement censorship resistance measures and utilise proof of work / proof of stake for each parachain as well as discussed in part three, thus parachains can’t just rely on the security of the relay chain, they need to ensure sybil resistance mechanisms using POW and POS are implemented on the parachain as well.

Avalanche

A subnet in Avalanche consists of a dynamic set of validators working together to achieve consensus on the state of a set of many blockchains where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. So unlike in Cosmos where each zone / hub has their own validators, A subnet can validate a single or many virtual machines / blockchains with a single validator set. Shared security is optional

Results

Shared security is mandatory in polkadot and a key design decision in its infrastructure. The relay chain validates the state transition of all connected parachains and thus scores ✅✅✅. Subnets in Avalanche can validate state of either a single or many virtual machines. Each subnet can have their own token and shares a validator set, where complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. It scores ✅ ✅. Every Zone and Hub in cosmos has their own validator set / token but research is underway to have the hub validate the state transition of connected zones, but as this is still early in the research phase scores ✅ for now.
https://preview.redd.it/0mnvpnzwdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=8927ff2821415817265be75c59261f83851a2791

Current Adoption

Cosmos

The Cosmos project started in 2016 with an ICO held in April 2017. There are currently around 50 projects building on the Cosmos SDK with a full list can be seen here and filtering for Cosmos SDK . Not all of the projects will necessarily connect using native cosmos sdk and IBC and some have forked parts of the Cosmos SDK and utilise the tendermint consensus such as Binance Chain but have said they will connect in the future.

Polkadot

The Polkadot project started in 2016 with an ICO held in October 2017. There are currently around 70 projects building on Substrate and a full list can be seen here and filtering for Substrate Based. Like with Cosmos not all projects built using substrate will necessarily connect to Polkadot and parachains or parathreads aren’t currently implemented in either the Live or Test network (Kusama) as of the time of this writing.

Avalanche

Avalanche in comparison started much later with Ava Labs being founded in 2018. Avalanche held it’s ICO in July 2020. Due to lot shorter time it has been in development, the number of projects confirmed are smaller with around 14 projects currently building on Avalanche. Due to the customisability of the platform though, many virtual machines can be used within a subnet making the process incredibly easy to port projects over. As an example, it will launch with the Ethereum Virtual Machine which enables byte for byte compatibility and all the tooling like Metamask, Truffle etc. will work, so projects can easily move over to benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. In the future Cosmos and Substrate virtual machines could be implemented on Avalanche.

Results

Whilst it’s still early for all 3 projects (and the entire blockchain space as a whole), there is currently more projects confirmed to be building on Cosmos and Polkadot, mostly due to their longer time in development. Whilst Cosmos has fewer projects, zones are implemented compared to Polkadot which doesn’t currently have parachains. IBC to connect zones and hubs together is due to launch Q2 2021, thus both score ✅✅✅. Avalanche has been in development for a lot shorter time period, but is launching with an impressive feature set right from the start with ability to create subnets, VMs, assets, NFTs, permissioned and permissionless blockchains, cross chain atomic swaps within a subnet, smart contracts, bridge to Ethereum etc. Applications can easily port over from other platforms and use all the existing tooling such as Metamask / Truffle etc but benefit from the performance, decentralisation and low gas fees offered. Currently though just based on the number of projects in comparison it scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/rsctxi6zdhq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=ff762dea3cfc2aaaa3c8fc7b1070d5be6759aac2

Enterprise Adoption

Cosmos

Cosmos enables permissioned and permissionless zones which can connect to each other with the ability to have full control over who validates the blockchain. For permissionless zones each zone / hub can have their own token and they are in control who validates.

Polkadot

With polkadot the state transition is performed by a small randomly selected assigned group of validators from the relay chain plus with the possibility that state is rolled back if an invalid transaction of any of the other parachains is found. This may pose a problem for enterprises that need complete control over who performs validation for regulatory reasons. In addition due to the limited number of parachain slots available Enterprises would have to acquire and lock up large amounts of a highly volatile asset (DOT) and have the possibility that they are outbid in future auctions and find they no longer can have their parachain validated and parathreads don’t provide the guaranteed performance requirements for the application to function.

Avalanche

Avalanche enables permissioned and permissionless subnets and complex rulesets can be configured to meet regulatory compliance. For example a subnet can be created where its mandatory that all validators are from a certain legal jurisdiction, or they hold a specific license and regulated by the SEC etc. Subnets are also able to scale to tens of thousands of validators, and even potentially millions of nodes, all participating in consensus so every enterprise can run their own node rather than only a small amount. Enterprises don’t have to hold large amounts of a highly volatile asset, but instead pay a fee in AVAX for the creation of the subnets and blockchains which is burnt.

Results

Avalanche provides the customisability to run private permissioned blockchains as well as permissionless where the enterprise is in control over who validates the blockchain, with the ability to use complex rulesets to meet regulatory compliance, thus scores ✅✅✅. Cosmos is also able to run permissioned and permissionless zones / hubs so enterprises have full control over who validates a blockchain and scores ✅✅. Polkadot requires locking up large amounts of a highly volatile asset with the possibility of being outbid by competitors and being unable to run the application if the guaranteed performance is required and having to migrate away. The relay chain validates the state transition and can roll back the parachain should an invalid block be detected on another parachain, thus scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/7phaylb1ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=d86d2ec49de456403edbaf27009ed0e25609fbff

Interoperability

Cosmos

Cosmos will connect Hubs and Zones together through its IBC protocol (due to release in Q1 2020). Connecting to blockchains outside of the Cosmos ecosystem would either require the connected blockchain to fork their code to implement IBC or more likely a custom “Peg Zone” will be created specific to work with a particular blockchain it’s trying to bridge to such as Ethereum etc. Each Zone and Hub has different trust levels and connectivity between 2 zones can have different trust depending on which path it takes (this is discussed more in this article). Finality time is low at 6 seconds, but depending on the number of hops, this can increase significantly.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s shared state means each parachain that connects shares the same trust assumptions, of the relay chain validators and that if one blockchain needs to be reverted, all of them will need to be reverted. Interoperability is enabled between parachains through Cross-Chain Message Passing (XCMP) protocol and is also possible to connect to other systems through bridges, which are specifically designed parachains or parathreads that each are custom made to interact with another ecosystem such as Ethereum and Bitcoin. Finality time between parachains is around 60 seconds, but longer will be needed (initial figures of 60 minutes in the whitepaper) for connecting to external blockchains. Thus limiting the appeal of connecting two external ecosystems together through Polkadot. Polkadot is also limited in the number of Parachain slots available, thus limiting the amount of blockchains that can be bridged. Parathreads could be used for lower performance bridges, but the speed of future blockchains is only going to increase.

Avalanche

A subnet can validate multiple virtual machines / blockchains and all blockchains within a subnet share the same trust assumptions / validator set, enabling cross chain interoperability. Interoperability is also possible between any other subnet, with the hope Avalanche will consist of thousands of subnets. Each subnet may have a different trust level, but as the primary network consists of all validators then this can be used as a source of trust if required. As Avalanche supports many virtual machines, bridges to other ecosystems are created by running the connected virtual machine. There will be an Ethereum bridge using the EVM shortly after mainnet. Finality time is much faster at sub 3 seconds (with most happening under 1 second) with no chance of rolling back so more appealing when connecting to external blockchains.

Results

All 3 systems are able to perform interoperability within their ecosystem and transfer assets as well as data, as well as use bridges to connect to external blockchains. Cosmos has different trust levels between its zones and hubs and can create issues depending on which path it takes and additional latency added. Polkadot provides the same trust assumptions for all connected parachains but has long finality and limited number of parachain slots available. Avalanche provides the same trust assumptions for all blockchains within a subnet, and different trust levels between subnets. However due to the primary network consisting of all validators it can be used for trust. Avalanche also has a much faster finality time with no limitation on the number of blockchains / subnets / bridges that can be created. Overall all three blockchains excel with interoperability within their ecosystem and each score ✅✅.
https://preview.redd.it/l775gue3ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=b7c4b5802ceb1a9307bd2a8d65f393d1bcb0d7c6

Tokenomics

Cosmos

The ATOM token is the native token for the Cosmos Hub. It is commonly mistaken by people that think it’s the token used throughout the cosmos ecosystem, whereas it’s just used for one of many hubs in Cosmos, each with their own token. Currently ATOM has little utility as IBC isn’t released and has no connections to other zones / hubs. Once IBC is released zones may prefer to connect to a different hub instead and so ATOM is not used. ATOM isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for ATOM as of the time of this writing is $1 Billion with 203 million circulating supply. Rewards can be earnt through staking to offset the dilution caused by inflation. Delegators can also get slashed and lose a portion of their ATOM should the validator misbehave.

Polkadot

Polkadot’s native token is DOT and it’s used to secure the Relay Chain. Each parachain needs to acquire sufficient DOT to win an auction on an available parachain lease period of up to 24 months at a time. Parathreads have a fixed fee for registration that would realistically be much lower than the cost of acquiring a parachain slot and compete with other parathreads in a per-block auction to have their transactions included in the next relay chain block. DOT isn’t a fixed capped supply token and supply will continuously increase with a yearly inflation of around 10% depending on the % staked. The current market cap for DOT as of the time of this writing is $4.4 Billion with 852 million circulating supply. Delegators can also get slashed and lose their DOT (potentially 100% of their DOT for serious attacks) should the validator misbehave.

Avalanche

AVAX is the native token for the primary network in Avalanche. Every validator of any subnet also has to validate the primary network and stake a minimum of 2000 AVAX. There is no limit to the number of validators like other consensus methods then this can cater for tens of thousands even potentially millions of validators. As every validator validates the primary network, this can be a source of trust for interoperability between subnets as well as connecting to other ecosystems, thus increasing amount of transaction fees of AVAX. There is no slashing in Avalanche, so there is no risk to lose your AVAX when selecting a validator, instead rewards earnt for staking can be slashed should the validator misbehave. Because Avalanche doesn’t have direct slashing, it is technically possible for someone to both stake AND deliver tokens for something like a flash loan, under the invariant that all tokens that are staked are returned, thus being able to make profit with staked tokens outside of staking itself.
There will also be a separate subnet for Athereum which is a ‘spoon,’ or friendly fork, of Ethereum, which benefits from the Avalanche consensus protocol and applications in the Ethereum ecosystem. It’s native token ATH will be airdropped to ETH holders as well as potentially AVAX holders as well. This can be done for other blockchains as well.
Transaction fees on the primary network for all 3 of the blockchains as well as subscription fees for creating a subnet and blockchain are paid in AVAX and are burnt, creating deflationary pressure. AVAX is a fixed capped supply of 720 million tokens, creating scarcity rather than an unlimited supply which continuously increase of tokens at a compounded rate each year like others. Initially there will be 360 tokens minted at Mainnet with vesting periods between 1 and 10 years, with tokens gradually unlocking each quarter. The Circulating supply is 24.5 million AVAX with tokens gradually released each quater. The current market cap of AVAX is around $100 million.

Results

Avalanche’s AVAX with its fixed capped supply, deflationary pressure, very strong utility, potential to receive air drops and low market cap, means it scores ✅✅✅. Polkadot’s DOT also has very strong utility with the need for auctions to acquire parachain slots, but has no deflationary mechanisms, no fixed capped supply and already valued at $3.8 billion, therefore scores ✅✅. Cosmos’s ATOM token is only for the Cosmos Hub, of which there will be many hubs in the ecosystem and has very little utility currently. (this may improve once IBC is released and if Cosmos hub actually becomes the hub that people want to connect to and not something like Binance instead. There is no fixed capped supply and currently valued at $1.1 Billion, so scores ✅.
https://preview.redd.it/zb72eto5ehq51.png?width=1000&format=png&auto=webp&s=0ee102a2881d763296ad9ffba20667f531d2fd7a
All three are excellent projects and have similarities as well as many differences. Just to reiterate this article is not intended to be an extensive in-depth list, but rather an overview based on some of the criteria that I feel are most important. For a more in-depth view I recommend reading the articles for each of the projects linked above and coming to your own conclusions, you may have different criteria which is important to you, and score them differently. There won’t be one platform to rule them all however, with some uses cases better suited to one platform over another, and it’s not a zero-sum game. Blockchain is going to completely revolutionize industries and the Internet itself. The more projects researching and delivering breakthrough technology the better, each learning from each other and pushing each other to reach that goal earlier. The current market is a tiny speck of what’s in store in terms of value and adoption and it’s going to be exciting to watch it unfold.
https://preview.redd.it/fwi3clz7ehq51.png?width=1388&format=png&auto=webp&s=c91c1645a4c67defd5fc3aaec84f4a765e1c50b6
xSeq22x your post has been copied because one or more comments in this topic have been removed. This copy will preserve unmoderated topic. If you would like to opt-out, please send a message using [this link].
submitted by anticensor_bot to u/anticensor_bot [link] [comments]

ETHE & GBTC (Grayscale) Frequently Asked Questions

It is no doubt Grayscale’s booming popularity as a mainstream investment has caused a lot of community hullabaloo lately. As such, I felt it was worth making a FAQ regarding the topic. I’m looking to update this as needed and of course am open to suggestions / adding any questions.
The goal is simply to have a thread we can link to anyone with questions on Grayscale and its products. Instead of explaining the same thing 3 times a day, shoot those posters over to this thread. My hope is that these questions are answered in a fairly simple and easy to understand manner. I think as the sub grows it will be a nice reference point for newcomers.
Disclaimer: I do NOT work for Grayscale and as such am basing all these answers on information that can be found on their website / reports. (Grayscale’s official FAQ can be found here). I also do NOT have a finance degree, I do NOT have a Series 6 / 7 / 140-whatever, and I do NOT work with investment products for my day job. I have an accounting background and work within the finance world so I have the general ‘business’ knowledge to put it all together, but this is all info determined in my best faith effort as a layman. The point being is this --- it is possible I may explain something wrong or missed the technical terms, and if that occurs I am more than happy to update anything that can be proven incorrect
Everything below will be in reference to ETHE but will apply to GBTC as well. If those two segregate in any way, I will note that accordingly.
What is Grayscale? 
Grayscale is the company that created the ETHE product. Their website is https://grayscale.co/
What is ETHE? 
ETHE is essentially a stock that intends to loosely track the price of ETH. It does so by having each ETHE be backed by a specific amount of ETH that is held on chain. Initially, the newly minted ETHE can only be purchased by institutions and accredited investors directly from Grayscale. Once a year has passed (6 months for GBTC) it can then be listed on the OTCQX Best Market exchange for secondary trading. Once listed on OTCQX, anyone investor can purchase at this point. Additional information on ETHE can be found here.
So ETHE is an ETF? 
No. For technical reasons beyond my personal understandings it is not labeled an ETF. I know it all flows back to the “Securities Act Rule 144”, but due to my limited knowledge on SEC regulations I don’t want to misspeak past that. If anyone is more knowledgeable on the subject I am happy to input their answer here.
How long has ETHE existed? 
ETHE was formed 12/14/2017. GBTC was formed 9/25/2013.
How is ETHE created? 
The trust will issue shares to “Authorized Participants” in groups of 100 shares (called baskets). Authorized Participants are the only persons that may place orders to create these baskets and they do it on behalf of the investor.
Source: Creation and Redemption of Shares section on page 39 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
Note – The way their reports word this makes it sound like there is an army of authorizers doing the dirty work, but in reality there is only one Authorized Participant. At this moment the “Genesis” company is the sole Authorized Participant. Genesis is owned by the “Digital Currency Group, Inc.” which is the parent company of Grayscale as well. (And to really go down the rabbit hole it looks like DCG is the parent company of CoinDesk and is “backing 150+ companies across 30 countries, including Coinbase, Ripple, and Chainalysis.”)
Source: Digital Currency Group, Inc. informational section on page 77 of the “Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) Form 10-K (2019)” – Located Here
Source: Barry E. Silbert informational section on page 75 of the “Grayscale Bitcoin Trust (BTC) Form 10-K (2019)” – Located Here
How does Grayscale acquire the ETH to collateralize the ETHE product? 
An Investor may acquire ETHE by paying in cash or exchanging ETH already owned.
Source: Creation and Redemption of Shares section on page 40 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
Where does Grayscale store their ETH? Does it have a specific wallet address we can follow? 
ETH is stored with Coinbase Custody Trust Company, LLC. I am unaware of any specific address or set of addresses that can be used to verify the ETH is actually there.
As an aside - I would actually love to see if anyone knows more about this as it’s something that’s sort of peaked my interest after being asked about it… I find it doubtful we can find that however.
Source: Part C. Business Information, Item 8, subsection A. on page 16 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
Can ETHE be redeemed for ETH? 
No, currently there is no way to give your shares of ETHE back to Grayscale to receive ETH back. The only method of getting back into ETH would be to sell your ETHE to someone else and then use those proceeds to buy ETH yourself.
Source: Redemption Procedures on page 41 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
Why are they not redeeming shares? 
I think the report summarizes it best:
Redemptions of Shares are currently not permitted and the Trust is unable to redeem Shares. Subject to receipt of regulatory approval from the SEC and approval by the Sponsor in its sole discretion, the Trust may in the future operate a redemption program. Because the Trust does not believe that the SEC would, at this time, entertain an application for the waiver of rules needed in order to operate an ongoing redemption program, the Trust currently has no intention of seeking regulatory approval from the SEC to operate an ongoing redemption program.
Source: Redemption Procedures on page 41 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
What is the fee structure? 
ETHE has an annual fee of 2.5%. GBTC has an annual fee of 2.0%. Fees are paid by selling the underlying ETH / BTC collateralizing the asset.
Source: ETHE’s informational page on Grayscale’s website - Located Here
Source: Description of Trust on page 31 & 32 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
What is the ratio of ETH to ETHE? 
At the time of posting (6/19/2020) each ETHE share is backed by .09391605 ETH. Each share of GBTC is backed by .00096038 BTC.
ETHE & GBTC’s specific information page on Grayscale’s website updates the ratio daily – Located Here
For a full historical look at this ratio, it can be found on the Grayscale home page on the upper right side if you go to Tax Documents > 2019 Tax Documents > Grayscale Ethereum Trust 2019 Tax Letter.
Why is the ratio not 1:1? Why is it always decreasing? 
While I cannot say for certain why the initial distribution was not a 1:1 backing, it is more than likely to keep the price down and allow more investors a chance to purchase ETHE / GBTC.
As noted above, fees are paid by selling off the ETH collateralizing ETHE. So this number will always be trending downward as time goes on.
Source: Description of Trust on page 32 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
I keep hearing about how this is locked supply… explain? 
As noted above, there is currently no redemption program for converting your ETHE back into ETH. This means that once an ETHE is issued, it will remain in circulation until a redemption program is formed --- something that doesn’t seem to be too urgent for the SEC or Grayscale at the moment. Tiny amounts will naturally be removed due to fees, but the bulk of the asset is in there for good.
Knowing that ETHE cannot be taken back and destroyed at this time, the ETH collateralizing it will not be removed from the wallet for the foreseeable future. While it is not fully locked in the sense of say a totally lost key, it is not coming out any time soon.
Per their annual statement:
The Trust’s ETH will be transferred out of the ETH Account only in the following circumstances: (i) transferred to pay the Sponsor’s Fee or any Additional Trust Expenses, (ii) distributed in connection with the redemption of Baskets (subject to the Trust’s obtaining regulatory approval from the SEC to operate an ongoing redemption program and the consent of the Sponsor), (iii) sold on an as-needed basis to pay Additional Trust Expenses or (iv) sold on behalf of the Trust in the event the Trust terminates and liquidates its assets or as otherwise required by law or regulation.
Source: Description of Trust on page 31 of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
Grayscale now owns a huge chunk of both ETH and BTC’s supply… should we be worried about manipulation, a sell off to crash the market crash, a staking cartel? 
First, it’s important to remember Grayscale is a lot more akin to an exchange then say an investment firm. Grayscale is working on behalf of its investors to create this product for investor control. Grayscale doesn’t ‘control’ the ETH it holds any more then Coinbase ‘controls’ the ETH in its hot wallet. (Note: There are likely some varying levels of control, but specific to this topic Grayscale cannot simply sell [legally, at least] the ETH by their own decision in the same manner Coinbase wouldn't be able to either.)
That said, there shouldn’t be any worry in the short to medium time-frame. As noted above, Grayscale can’t really remove ETH other than for fees or termination of the product. At 2.5% a year, fees are noise in terms of volume. Grayscale seems to be the fastest growing product in the crypto space at the moment and termination of the product seems unlikely.
IF redemptions were to happen tomorrow, it’s extremely unlikely we would see a mass exodus out of the product to redeem for ETH. And even if there was incentive to get back to ETH, the premium makes it so that it would be much more cost effective to just sell your ETHE on the secondary market and buy ETH yourself. Remember, any redemption is up to the investors and NOT something Grayscale has direct control over.
Yes, but what about [insert criminal act here]… 
Alright, yes. Technically nothing is stopping Grayscale from selling all the ETH / BTC and running off to the Bahamas (Hawaii?). BUT there is no real reason for them to do so. Barry is an extremely public figure and it won’t be easy for him to get away with that. Grayscale’s Bitcoin Trust creates SEC reports weekly / bi-weekly and I’m sure given the sentiment towards crypto is being watched carefully. Plus, Grayscale is making tons of consistent revenue and thus has little to no incentive to give that up for a quick buck.
That’s a lot of ‘happy little feels’ Bob, is there even an independent audit or is this Tether 2.0? 
Actually yes, an independent auditor report can be found in their annual reports. It is clearly aimed more towards the financial side and I doubt the auditors are crypto savants, but it is at least one extra set of eyes. Auditors are Friedman LLP – Auditor since 2015.
Source: Independent Auditor Report starting on page 116 (of the PDF itself) of the “Grayscale Ethereum Trust Annual Report (2019)” – Located Here
As mentioned by user TheCrpytosAndBloods (In Comments Below), a fun fact:
The company’s auditors Friedman LLP were also coincidentally TetheBitfinex’s auditors until They controversially parted ways in 2018 when the Tether controversy was at its height. I am not suggesting for one moment that there is anything shady about DCG - I just find it interesting it’s the same auditor.
“Grayscale sounds kind of lame” / “Not your keys not your crypto!” / “Why is anyone buying this, it sounds like a scam?” 
Welp, for starters this honestly is not really a product aimed at the people likely to be reading this post. To each their own, but do remember just because something provides no value to you doesn’t mean it can’t provide value to someone else. That said some of the advertised benefits are as follows:
So for example, I can set up an IRA at a brokerage account that has $0 trading fees. Then I can trade GBTC and ETHE all day without having to worry about tracking my taxes. All with the relative safety something like E-Trade provides over Binance.
As for how it benefits the everyday ETH holder? I think the supply lock is a positive. I also think this product exposes the Ethereum ecosystem to people who otherwise wouldn’t know about it.
Why is there a premium? Why is ETHE’s premium so insanely high compared to GBTC’s premium? 
There are a handful of theories of why a premium exists at all, some even mentioned in the annual report. The short list is as follows:
Why is ETHE’s so much higher the GBTC’s? Again, a few thoughts:

Are there any other differences between ETHE and GBTC? 
I touched on a few of the smaller differences, but one of the more interesting changes is GBTC is now a “SEC reporting company” as of January 2020. Which again goes beyond my scope of knowledge so I won’t comment on it too much… but the net result is GBTC is now putting out weekly / bi-weekly 8-K’s and annual 10-K’s. This means you can track GBTC that much easier at the moment as well as there is an extra layer of validity to the product IMO.
I’m looking for some statistics on ETHE… such as who is buying, how much is bought, etc? 
There is a great Q1 2020 report I recommend you give a read that has a lot of cool graphs and data on the product. It’s a little GBTC centric, but there is some ETHE data as well. It can be found here hidden within the 8-K filings.Q1 2020 is the 4/16/2020 8-K filing.
For those more into a GAAP style report see the 2019 annual 10-K of the same location.
Is Grayscale only just for BTC and ETH? 
No, there are other products as well. In terms of a secondary market product, ETCG is the Ethereum Classic version of ETHE. Fun Fact – ETCG was actually put out to the secondary market first. It also has a 3% fee tied to it where 1% of it goes to some type of ETC development fund.
In terms of institutional and accredited investors, there are a few ‘fan favorites’ such as Bitcoin Cash, Litcoin, Stellar, XRP, and Zcash. Something called Horizion (Backed by ZEN I guess? Idk to be honest what that is…). And a diversified Mutual Fund type fund that has a little bit of all of those. None of these products are available on the secondary market.
Are there alternatives to Grayscale? 
I know they exist, but I don’t follow them. I’ll leave this as a “to be edited” section and will add as others comment on what they know.
Per user Over-analyser (in comments below):
Coinshares (Formerly XBT provider) are the only similar product I know of. BTC, ETH, XRP and LTC as Exchange Traded Notes (ETN).
It looks like they are fully backed with the underlying crypto (no premium).
https://coinshares.com/etps/xbt-provideinvestor-resources/daily-hedging-position
Denominated in SEK and EUR. Certainly available in some UK pensions (SIPP).
As asked by pegcity - Okay so I was under the impression you can just give them your own ETH and get ETHE, but do you get 11 ETHE per ETH or do you get the market value of ETH in USD worth of ETHE? 
I have always understood that the ETHE issued directly through Grayscale is issued without the premium. As in, if I were to trade 1 ETH for ETHE I would get 11, not say only 2 or 3 because the secondary market premium is so high. And if I were paying cash only I would be paying the price to buy 1 ETH to get my 11 ETHE. Per page 39 of their annual statement, it reads as follows:
The Trust will issue Shares to Authorized Participants from time to time, but only in one or more Baskets (with a Basket being a block of 100 Shares). The Trust will not issue fractions of a Basket. The creation (and, should the Trust commence a redemption program, redemption) of Baskets will be made only in exchange for the delivery to the Trust, or the distribution by the Trust, of the number of whole and fractional ETH represented by each Basket being created (or, should the Trust commence a redemption program, redeemed), which is determined by dividing (x) the number of ETH owned by the Trust at 4:00 p.m., New York time, on the trade date of a creation or redemption order, after deducting the number of ETH representing the U.S. dollar value of accrued but unpaid fees and expenses of the Trust (converted using the ETH Index Price at such time, and carried to the eighth decimal place), by (y) the number of Shares outstanding at such time (with the quotient so obtained calculated to one one-hundred-millionth of one ETH (i.e., carried to the eighth decimal place)), and multiplying such quotient by 100 (the “Basket ETH Amount”). All questions as to the calculation of the Basket ETH Amount will be conclusively determined by the Sponsor and will be final and binding on all persons interested in the Trust. The Basket ETH Amount multiplied by the number of Baskets being created or redeemed is the “Total Basket ETH Amount.” The number of ETH represented by a Share will gradually decrease over time as the Trust’s ETH are used to pay the Trust’s expenses. Each Share represented approximately 0.0950 ETH and 0.0974 ETH as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively.

submitted by Bob-Rossi to ethfinance [link] [comments]

Trying to figure out best way to execute HODL plan -- Any Input Greatly Appreciated!

I posted this in the binance sub yesterday and received no responses, so today I tried to post in the bitcoinbeginners sub and my post was instantly removed for who knows why, so now I'm here, really hoping to get some basic insight!!!

I'm pretty new to the cryptocurrency world, but after reading up on VeChain and a few other coins, I've become interested in investing one or two thousand between a few different coins. I'm not planning to do any day trading or mining.
What my newbie level of research has brought to my attention is that if I want to make a full round trip of investing a few thousand, letting it mature, and say withdrawing a significant portion back into fiat USD (live in US) in a few years, what would be the best way to go about that?
My current idea is something along the lines of:
  1. Initially exchanging let's say $1000 USD for bitcoin via funding from my checking account through something like Gemini or Coinbase (Can't do that directly with binance.us right?).
  2. From there I could create a binance account and exchange this bitcoin into VET and a few other coins.
  3. Next I would create my own wallet, let's say with Exodus (or some other wallet: recommendations?) and store all the coins there for a number of months or years.
  4. Finally, when I'm ready to cash out I would convert all my coins back to bitcoin (using binance again?) and transfer them back to the initial place of purchase (gemini/coinbase/betterplace?) and instantly convert that to fiat USD and then ach or wire that back to my checking account.
Please tell me if I am thinking about this all wrong? How would you execute this type of plan?
p.s. Extra newby question: would a wallet like exodus have high fees for the transfers out when i'm ready to cashout in many months/years?
If you made it this far, thanks for reading through! Any thoughts are appreciated!
submitted by Funguyguy to CryptoCurrencies [link] [comments]

coinlibanalysis1

https://coinlib.io/coin/BTC/Bitcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETH/Ethereum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XRP/XRP#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNB/Binance+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDT/Tether#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINK/ChainLink#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCH/Bitcoin+Cash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LTC/Litecoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BSV/Bitcoin+SV#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOS/EOS#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADA/Cardano#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRO/Crypto.com+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRX/TRON#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XTZ/Tezos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XMMonero#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XLM/Stellar#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEO/NEO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEO3/UNUS+SED+LEO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HT/Huobi+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XEM/NEM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Cosmos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNX/Synthetix#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOT/IOTA#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEND/EthLend#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DASH/Dash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VET/VeChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEC/ZCash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETC/Ethereum+Classic#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONT/Ontology#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OMG/OmiseGo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MKMaker#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDC/USCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/THETA/Theta+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYN/Hyperion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OKB/OKB+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BAT/Basic+Attention+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DOGE/Dogecoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FXC/Flexacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZRX/0x#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QTUM/QTUM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAVES/Waves#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGB/DigiByte#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ICX/ICON#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDC/EDCBlockchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LRC/Loopring#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ALGO/Algorand#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KNC/KyberNetwork+Crystal#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REN/Republic+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REP/Augur#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAX/Paxos+Standard+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LSK/Lisk#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ANT/Aragon#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZIL/Zilliqa#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZB/ZB+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCDecred#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTG/Bitcoin+Gold#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGD/Digix+DAO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SC/Siacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUSD/TrueUSD#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENJ/Enjin+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERD/Elrond#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAI/Dai#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NANO/Nano#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCD/Bitcoin+Diamond#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNT/Golem+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DX/DxChain+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABBC/ABBC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNT/Status+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Atomic+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QNT/Quant#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RVN/Ravencoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUNA/Luna#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/Bytom#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RLC/iEx.ec#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HOT/HoloToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MONA/MonaCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MANA/Decentraland#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOST/IOStoken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTS/Bitshares#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UTK/Utrust#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XVG/Verge#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNT/Bancor+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MCO/Monaco#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEXO/Nexo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELF/aelf#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORJ/Storj#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STEEM/Steem#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KMD/Komodo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RSReserve+Rights#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARDArdor#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNO/Gnosis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENG/Enigma#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HSHshare#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MATIC/Matic+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FTM/Fantom+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETN/Electroneum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STRAT/Stratis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GUSD/Gemini+Dollar#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WIC/WaykiChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VSYS/V+Systems#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XIN/Mixin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCC/CryptoVerificationCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CENNZ/Centrality#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOMO/TomoCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HDAC/Hyundai+DAC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARK/ARK#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXC/Gx+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAID/MaidSafe+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AE/Aeternity#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AION/Aion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEN/Horizen#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SYS/Syscoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXS/GXShares#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAN/Wanchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REV/Revain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/THEX/THEX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/POWPower+Ledger#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOLVE/SOLVE#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TFUEL/Theta+Fuel#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MLN/Melon#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXS/Pundi+X#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AGI/SingularityNET#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBT/Unibright#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELA/Elastos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGTX/Digitex+Futures#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DATA/Streamr+DATAcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QSP/Quantstamp#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XZC/ZCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDD/ReddCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RCN/Ripio#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ORBS/Orbis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCN/ByteCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLZ/Bluzelle#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEST/Vestchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIVX/PIVX+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NULS/NULS#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOOM/Loom+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDCE/XinFin+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRPT/Crypterium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUN/FunFair#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WTC/Waltonchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAS/Nebulas+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REQ/Request+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AST/AirSwap#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LAMB/Lambda#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GAS/Gas#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAG/Constellation#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSN/Stakenet#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNX/Genaro+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CTXC/Cortex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IGNIS/Ignis#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DENT/Dent#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOTX/IoTeX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CELCeler+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XHV/Haven+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETP/Metaverse#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CND/Cindicator#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FSN/Fusion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPT/Populous#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FOForce+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QASH/QASH#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIM/Nimiq#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRS/Groestlcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABT/Arcblock#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KBC/KaratGold+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FCT/Factom#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DRGN/Dragonchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NXS/Nexus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LA/LAToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDN/Raiden+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZAP/Zap#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VTC/VertCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/APL/Apollo+Currency#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORM/Storm#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADX/AdEx#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTL/Metal#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVC/Civic#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SBD/Steem+Backed+Dollars#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBQ/Ubiq#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CS/Credits#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VGX/Voyager+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WINGS/Wings+DAO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEON/ZEON+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MFT/Mainframe#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRIN/Grin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WGWagerr#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BRD/Bread+token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KEY/SelfKey#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACT/Achain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IQ/Everipedia#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAY/TenX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VITE/VITE#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TEL/Telcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAV/NavCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIX/Bibox+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WABI/WaBi#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DMT/DMarket#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TTC3/TTC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KIN/Kin+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MET2/Metronome#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BURST/Burst#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEBL/Neblio#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ITC/IoT+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/INT/Internet+Node+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPC/PeerCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEW/Newton#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GVT/Genesis+Vision#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCT/TokenClub#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PRO/Propy#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ODE/Odem#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DNT/district0x#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DERO/DERO#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMO/Amo+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GTO/Gifto#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AEON/AeonCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UPP/Sentinel+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EVX/Everex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKY/Skycoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDN/DigitalNote#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LET/LinkEye#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/B2B/B2BX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SRN/SirinLabs#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNB/Time+New+Bank#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONG/onG.social#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDA/Moeda#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TPAY/TokenPay#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/POA/POA+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMT/SmartMesh#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RUFF/Ruff#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SALT/Salt+Lending#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GARD/Hashgard#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HC/Harvest+Masternode+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LBC/LBRY+Credits#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SERO/Super+Zero#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FNB/FNB+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CDT/CoinDash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIX/NIX+Platform#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOUL/Phantasma#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLOCK/Blocknet#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QKC/QuarkChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZ/Bit-Z+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/POE/Po.et#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PART/Particl#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SWFTC/SwftCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZNT/Bezant#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QLC/QLC+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNM/SONM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNGLS/SingularDTV#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIA/ViaCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NKN/NKN#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDS/MediShares#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAS/Asch#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EGT/Egretia#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PMA/PumaPay#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXSXEM/Pundi+X+NEM#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATP/Atlas+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIBE/VIBE+(VIBEHub)#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ILC/ILCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMART/SmartCash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABYSS/Abyss#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNT/Tierion#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CNN/Content+Neutrality+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/APPC/AppCoins#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WPWePower#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DLT/Agrello+Delta#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEELE/Seele#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BWX/Blue+Whale+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NCASH/Nucleus+Vision#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOAH/Noahcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NLG/Gulden#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/JNT/Jibrel+Network+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MITH/Mithril#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMB/Ambrosus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCH/Tiger+Cash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAI/PChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/YOYOW/Yoyow#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/INXT/Internxt#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIB/Viberate#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNC/SunContract#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEL/Zel#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOS/NOS+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABL/Airbloc#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPX/APEX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DTA/Data#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEE/Yee#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDR2/Endor+Protocol+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEAM/Beam#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QUN/QunQun#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKM/Skrumble+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEAL/Seal+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CARD/Cardstack#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAUXaurum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACC/AdCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINA/Lina#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MOBI/Mobius#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OAX/OAX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VDG/VeriDocGlobal#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IONC/IONChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLK/BlackCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UGAS/UGAS#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OST/SimpleToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CZCanonChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCPT/BlockMason+Credit+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCN/Dentacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MVP/Merculet#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OLT/OneLedger#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LCC/LitecoinCash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXRN/EXRNchain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTH/Monetha#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OCN/Odyssey#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LYM/Lympo#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DDD/Scry.info#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PST/Primas#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBEX/Ubex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOL/Tolar#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SS/Sharder#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDN/Eden+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CURE/Curecoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAX/DAEX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RNT/OneRoot+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIN/VinChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BOX/ContentBox#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/REM/REMME#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHAT/ChatCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROX/Robotina#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZUM/ZumCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TBX/Tokenbox#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOSDAC/eosDAC#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/USC/Ultimate+Secure+Cash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAT/Datum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEX/Vexanium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SLT/Smartlands#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZCO/Zebi+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPY/Peerplays#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAYX/Paypex#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYDRO/Hydro#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DBC/DeepBrain+Chain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SUB/Substratum+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QCH/QChi#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/BitMark#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTO/Bottos#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HMQ/Humaniq#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACAT/Alphacat#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPC/CPChain#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ISIKC/Isiklar+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHX/Chainium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NSD/Nasdacoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SHIFT/Shift#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RFRefereum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EKO/EchoLink#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROCK/RocketCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CLOAK/CloakCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AXE/Axe#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXP/Expanse#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEMercury#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IHT/IHT+Real+Estate+Protocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUBE/BitTube#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHTX/SophiaTX#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SSC/SelfSell#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IMT/MoneyToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SCV/Super+CoinView+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EQUAD/QuadrantProtocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOTO/Tourist+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AAC/Acute+Angle+Cloud#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/COSM/Cosmo+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOBS/LOBSTEX+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEED/YEED#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIPL/PiplCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAS/MidasProtocol#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SIB/Sibcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUN/Lunyr#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSG/SnowGem#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHSphere+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEME/Pepe+Memetic#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/AIT/AICHAIN#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZXC/0xcert#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/0XBTC/0xBitcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIBirake#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRTL/TurtleCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/QBT/Qbao#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEET/BeetleCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUEL/Etherparty#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOTE/DNotes#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FDZ/Friendz#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RATING/DPRating#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCOIN/Crypviser#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/RTE/Rate3#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABX/Arbidex+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HBZ/HBZ+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/GEO/GeoCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARN/Aeron#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HGT/Hello+Gold#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/UT/Ulord#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PCL/Peculium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/METM/MetaMorph+Pro#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DUO/ParallelCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/HQX/HOQU#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEXC/MEXC+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZLA/Zilla#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TGAME/Truegame#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BBO/Bigbom#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STQ/Storiqa+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERC20/ERC20#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAC/DACash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/FOXT/Fox+Trading#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADI/Aditus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/JET/Jetcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/PTT/Proton+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/EVN/EvenCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TDP/TrueDeck#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/OCEAN/BurstOcean#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELY/Elysian#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETHO/Ether-1#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/DML/Decentralized+Machine+Learning#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BETHEBethereum#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/KLKS/Kalkulus#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNS/Transcodium#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MORE/More+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/APAPR+Coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATB/ATB+coin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XUEZ/Xuez#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/WEB/Webcoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/SINS/SafeInsure#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTT/Blocktrade#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CEN/Coinsuper+Ecosystem+Network#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/IG/IGToken#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/STREAM/STREAMIT+COIN#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/META/Metacash#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/CMT/CometCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/MNX/MinexCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BPT/Blockport#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIP/BipCoin#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/BOLD/Boldman+Capital#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/XOV/XOVBank#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARC/Arcade+Token#analysis
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIKKY/VikkyToken#analysis
submitted by Quippykisset to peaceCorpsCoding [link] [comments]

coinlib analysis

https://coinlib.io/coin/BTC/Bitcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETH/Ethereum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XRP/XRP#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNB/Binance+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDT/Tether#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINK/ChainLink#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCH/Bitcoin+Cash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LTC/Litecoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BSV/Bitcoin+SV#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOS/EOS#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADA/Cardano#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRO/Crypto.com+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRX/TRON#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XTZ/Tezos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XMMonero#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XLM/Stellar#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEO/NEO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEO3/UNUS+SED+LEO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HT/Huobi+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XEM/NEM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Cosmos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNX/Synthetix#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOT/IOTA#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LEND/EthLend#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DASH/Dash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VET/VeChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEC/ZCash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETC/Ethereum+Classic#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONT/Ontology#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OMG/OmiseGo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MKMaker#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/USDC/USCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/THETA/Theta+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYN/Hyperion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OKB/OKB+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BAT/Basic+Attention+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DOGE/Dogecoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FXC/Flexacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZRX/0x#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QTUM/QTUM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAVES/Waves#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGB/DigiByte#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ICX/ICON#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDC/EDCBlockchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LRC/Loopring#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ALGO/Algorand#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KNC/KyberNetwork+Crystal#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REN/Republic+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REP/Augur#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAX/Paxos+Standard+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LSK/Lisk#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ANT/Aragon#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZIL/Zilliqa#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZB/ZB+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCDecred#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTG/Bitcoin+Gold#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGD/Digix+DAO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SC/Siacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUSD/TrueUSD#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENJ/Enjin+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERD/Elrond#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAI/Dai#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NANO/Nano#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCD/Bitcoin+Diamond#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNT/Golem+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DX/DxChain+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABBC/ABBC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNT/Status+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATOM/Atomic+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QNT/Quant#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RVN/Ravencoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUNA/Luna#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/Bytom#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RLC/iEx.ec#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HOT/HoloToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MONA/MonaCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MANA/Decentraland#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOST/IOStoken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTS/Bitshares#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UTK/Utrust#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XVG/Verge#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BNT/Bancor+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MCO/Monaco#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEXO/Nexo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELF/aelf#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORJ/Storj#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STEEM/Steem#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KMD/Komodo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RSReserve+Rights#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARDArdor#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNO/Gnosis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ENG/Enigma#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HSHshare#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MATIC/Matic+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FTM/Fantom+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETN/Electroneum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STRAT/Stratis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GUSD/Gemini+Dollar#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WIC/WaykiChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VSYS/V+Systems#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XIN/Mixin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCC/CryptoVerificationCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CENNZ/Centrality#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOMO/TomoCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HDAC/Hyundai+DAC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARK/ARK#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXC/Gx+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAID/MaidSafe+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AE/Aeternity#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AION/Aion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEN/Horizen#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SYS/Syscoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GXS/GXShares#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WAN/Wanchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REV/Revain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/THEX/THEX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/POWPower+Ledger#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOLVE/SOLVE#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TFUEL/Theta+Fuel#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MLN/Melon#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXS/Pundi+X#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AGI/SingularityNET#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBT/Unibright#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ELA/Elastos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DGTX/Digitex+Futures#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DATA/Streamr+DATAcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QSP/Quantstamp#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XZC/ZCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDD/ReddCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RCN/Ripio#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ORBS/Orbis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCN/ByteCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLZ/Bluzelle#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEST/Vestchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIVX/PIVX+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NULS/NULS#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOOM/Loom+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDCE/XinFin+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CRPT/Crypterium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUN/FunFair#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WTC/Waltonchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAS/Nebulas+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REQ/Request+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AST/AirSwap#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LAMB/Lambda#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GAS/Gas#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAG/Constellation#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSN/Stakenet#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GNX/Genaro+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CTXC/Cortex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IGNIS/Ignis#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DENT/Dent#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IOTX/IoTeX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CELCeler+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XHV/Haven+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ETP/Metaverse#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CND/Cindicator#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FSN/Fusion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPT/Populous#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FOForce+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QASH/QASH#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIM/Nimiq#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRS/Groestlcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABT/Arcblock#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KBC/KaratGold+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FCT/Factom#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DRGN/Dragonchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NXS/Nexus#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LA/LAToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RDN/Raiden+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZAP/Zap#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VTC/VertCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/APL/Apollo+Currency#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STORM/Storm#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ADX/AdEx#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTL/Metal#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVC/Civic#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SBD/Steem+Backed+Dollars#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBQ/Ubiq#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CS/Credits#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VGX/Voyager+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WINGS/Wings+DAO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEON/ZEON+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MFT/Mainframe#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GRIN/Grin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WGWagerr#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BRD/Bread+token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KEY/SelfKey#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACT/Achain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IQ/Everipedia#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAY/TenX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VITE/VITE#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TEL/Telcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NAV/NavCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIX/Bibox+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WABI/WaBi#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DMT/DMarket#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TTC3/TTC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/KIN/Kin+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MET2/Metronome#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BURST/Burst#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEBL/Neblio#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ITC/IoT+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/INT/Internet+Node+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPC/PeerCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NEW/Newton#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GVT/Genesis+Vision#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCT/TokenClub#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PRO/Propy#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ODE/Odem#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DNT/district0x#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DERO/DERO#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMO/Amo+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GTO/Gifto#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AEON/AeonCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UPP/Sentinel+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EVX/Everex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKY/Skycoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XDN/DigitalNote#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LET/LinkEye#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/B2B/B2BX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SRN/SirinLabs#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNB/Time+New+Bank#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ONG/onG.social#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDA/Moeda#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TPAY/TokenPay#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/POA/POA+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMT/SmartMesh#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RUFF/Ruff#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SALT/Salt+Lending#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GARD/Hashgard#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HC/Harvest+Masternode+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LBC/LBRY+Credits#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SERO/Super+Zero#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FNB/FNB+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CDT/CoinDash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NIX/NIX+Platform#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SOUL/Phantasma#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLOCK/Blocknet#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QKC/QuarkChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZ/Bit-Z+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/POE/Po.et#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PART/Particl#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SWFTC/SwftCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BZNT/Bezant#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QLC/QLC+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNM/SONM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNGLS/SingularDTV#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIA/ViaCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NKN/NKN#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MDS/MediShares#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAS/Asch#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EGT/Egretia#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PMA/PumaPay#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NPXSXEM/Pundi+X+NEM#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ATP/Atlas+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIBE/VIBE+(VIBEHub)#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ILC/ILCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SMART/SmartCash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABYSS/Abyss#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TNT/Tierion#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CNN/Content+Neutrality+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/APPC/AppCoins#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/WPWePower#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DLT/Agrello+Delta#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEELE/Seele#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BWX/Blue+Whale+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NCASH/Nucleus+Vision#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOAH/Noahcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NLG/Gulden#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/JNT/Jibrel+Network+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MITH/Mithril#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AMB/Ambrosus#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TCH/Tiger+Cash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAI/PChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/YOYOW/Yoyow#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/INXT/Internxt#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIB/Viberate#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SNC/SunContract#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZEL/Zel#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOS/NOS+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABL/Airbloc#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPX/APEX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DTA/Data#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEE/Yee#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDR2/Endor+Protocol+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEAM/Beam#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QUN/QunQun#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SKM/Skrumble+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SEAL/Seal+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CARD/Cardstack#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XAUXaurum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACC/AdCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LINA/Lina#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MOBI/Mobius#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OAX/OAX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VDG/VeriDocGlobal#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IONC/IONChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BLK/BlackCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UGAS/UGAS#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OST/SimpleToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CZCanonChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BCPT/BlockMason+Credit+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DCN/Dentacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MVP/Merculet#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OLT/OneLedger#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LCC/LitecoinCash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXRN/EXRNchain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MTH/Monetha#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/OCN/Odyssey#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LYM/Lympo#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DDD/Scry.info#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PST/Primas#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UBEX/Ubex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOL/Tolar#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SS/Sharder#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EDN/Eden+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CURE/Curecoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAX/DAEX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RNT/OneRoot+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VIN/VinChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BOX/ContentBox#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/REM/REMME#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHAT/ChatCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROX/Robotina#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZUM/ZumCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TBX/Tokenbox#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EOSDAC/eosDAC#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/USC/Ultimate+Secure+Cash#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAT/Datum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/VEX/Vexanium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SLT/Smartlands#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZCO/Zebi+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PPY/Peerplays#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PAYX/Paypex#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HYDRO/Hydro#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DBC/DeepBrain+Chain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SUB/Substratum+Network#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QCH/QChi#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTM/BitMark#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BTO/Bottos#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HMQ/Humaniq#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ACAT/Alphacat#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CPC/CPChain#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ISIKC/Isiklar+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CHX/Chainium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NSD/Nasdacoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SHIFT/Shift#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RFRefereum#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EKO/EchoLink#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ROCK/RocketCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CLOAK/CloakCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AXE/Axe#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EXP/Expanse#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEMercury#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IHT/IHT+Real+Estate+Protocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TUBE/BitTube#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHTX/SophiaTX#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SSC/SelfSell#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/IMT/MoneyToken#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SCV/Super+CoinView+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/EQUAD/QuadrantProtocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TOTO/Tourist+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AAC/Acute+Angle+Cloud#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/COSM/Cosmo+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LOBS/LOBSTEX+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/YEED/YEED#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PIPL/PiplCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MAS/MidasProtocol#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SIB/Sibcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/LUN/Lunyr#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/XSG/SnowGem#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/SPHSphere+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEME/Pepe+Memetic#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/AIT/AICHAIN#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZXC/0xcert#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/0XBTC/0xBitcoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BIBirake#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TRTL/TurtleCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/QBT/Qbao#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BEET/BeetleCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FUEL/Etherparty#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/NOTE/DNotes#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/FDZ/Friendz#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RATING/DPRating#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/CVCOIN/Crypviser#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/RTE/Rate3#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ABX/Arbidex+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HBZ/HBZ+Coin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/GEO/GeoCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ARN/Aeron#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HGT/Hello+Gold#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/UT/Ulord#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/PCL/Peculium#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/METM/MetaMorph+Pro#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DUO/ParallelCoin#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/HQX/HOQU#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/MEXC/MEXC+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ZLA/Zilla#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/TGAME/Truegame#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/BBO/Bigbom#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/STQ/Storiqa+Token#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/ERC20/ERC20#performance
https://coinlib.io/coin/DAC/DACash#performance
submitted by Quippykisset to peaceCorpsCoding [link] [comments]

Binance Chain --- The Epitome Of $hitcoin Platforms HUUGE CRYPTO NEWS  Bitcoin Halving 2020, Cardano, Tezos, Binance, Crypto.com, Vechain, Telos, Hive IS ALTSEASON OVER?! Bitcoin, Ethereum, ChainLink, Binance ... BITCOIN BULL RUN IN 30 DAYS SAYS CRYPTO TRADER - Binance Biggest Upgrade Ever Bitcoin Q&A: Binance hack, chain roll-back? I’ve Changed My Mind on Binance!! BNB #1 Altcoin!? Binance Has Gone Off The Rails Is Rolling Back Bitcoin A Possibility? New PUMP Trend - Chain Migrations? Binance and BNB #502 Binance Chain kommt, Bitcoin ist klinisch tot ... Binance Chain is COMING - Dash XRP TRX Updates [Bitcoin and Cryptocurrency News]

DeFi has become one of the critical growth areas for Ethereum since 2019. Other competing blockchains are also building DeFi products, yet at a much slower pace. Ethereum-based DeFi’s user-side remains small, with an average number of more than 40,000 monthly users, and 90% of these users are using decentralized exchanges.; Meanwhile, the number of active projects, i.e., with more than 50 ... While the price of Bitcoin remained around USD 1,000-2,000 until early 2017, the second half of 2017 saw Bitcoin reaching new highs with a sharp increase in late 2017 to reach an all-time high slightly below USD 20,000.After that, its price collapsed to USD 3,500 in late 2018.. Since the beginning of 2019, Bitcoin price has rebounded to price levels near USD 10,000. The latest study by the World Bank shows that it costs 4.98% on average to remit funds to South Asia which makes it the least expensive region while sub-Sahara Africa is the most expensive with an ... Binance registered revenues of over $3 billion in the first half of 2018, while the crypto-market saw its value decrease from $800 billion in January to sub-$200 billion at the time of writing ... New Binance CEO AMA Touches on Bitcoin ETF, Ripple/XRP, Binance Chain and Blockchain’s Future. Bitcoin. New Binance CEO AMA Touches on Bitcoin ETF, Ripple/XRP, Binance Chain and Blockchain’s Future. by PumpMoonshot 7 February 2019 0 269. Share 0. A few hours back, Binance CEO ‘Changpeng Zhao’ conducted an all-new AMA-type session on Periscope during which he answered a host of ... Fellow Binancians, At approximately 2020/11/15 12:00 PM (UTC), the Bitco... Multiple Bitcoin Projects Supported. The report shows that Blockstream and Lightning Labs have become by-far the top institutions working on Bitcoin development. Seeking to create long-term solutions to the scalability challenge, both are pouring significant resources into side chains that promise to ease congestion on the main network. The two likely scenarios to occur with the Bitcoin Cash ABC (BCHA) and Bitcoin Cash Node (BCHN) contentious hard fork are: Scenario A: The fork results in two competing chains. Binance will credit users with BCH from the chain with the most work done. We will then also credit users with the coin from the minority chain at a ratio of 1:1 based ... Businesses around the world continue to adopt bitcoin cash and in 2020 merchant acceptance continues to grow.Tallying up all the companies that accept BCH listed on sites like Green Pages, Map ... Trade over 40 cryptocurrencies and enjoy the lowest trading fees in America.

[index] [21179] [13891] [11569] [22448] [9104] [8310] [16022] [21492] [18756] [13665]

Binance Chain --- The Epitome Of $hitcoin Platforms

09:25 Binance & the Tether Cartel 11:54 Binance is Not Reducing Tether USDT Holdings 13:02 You Can't BS A BS'r: Binance Will Fail 13:48 Stop Using Binance! 14:12 Outro 📺Watch These Videos Again📺 What do you think about Binance Chain? Let's discuss! Special thanks to James Care for helping write this video. -----Binance Referral: https://goo.gl/RD7pLD $10 Of Free Bitcoin, Coinbase Referral ... Binance Chain and Binance's new DEX is coming out shortly. What does this mean? Updates on Dash, XRP, TRX and more Bitcoin and Crypto News! Become an INSIDE... http://bitcoin-informant.de/2018/12/05/502-binance-chain-kommt-bitcoin-ist-klinisch-tot-bitcoin-cash-als-trinkgeld-vergeben Hey Krypto Fans, Willkommen zur B... Chain Migrations might just be the "hot" "new" thing in crypto (again). Let's talk about what happened today with Mithril and it's migration to Binance Chain. We'll also cover what's happening ... Bitcoin Halving 2020 in 15 days, Daedalus 1.0 Released by Cardano ADA, Truffle Teams Up With Tezos ZTX, Binance Chain Adds Ontology ONT pegged Assets, Withdraw on USD Crypto.com, Vechain VET ... Is alt season ending or just taking a breather? Are alts really performing that badly? We take a look at a range of altcoins including Ethereum, Polkadot, Bi... On-chain analyst Willy Woo published a new Bitcoin price model showing a new BTC bull run could begin in 30 days. One fundamental metric just reached levels not seen since just before the intense ... $10 Of Free Bitcoin, Coinbase Referral: https://goo.gl/qKZMmB Ledger Hardware Wallet Referral: https://goo.gl/tdcSmF Disclaimer: Statements on this site do not represent the views or policies of ... Binance considered rolling back the Bitcoin chain in order to recover stolen funds. How would that have happened? How likely is it that such a recovery method would be executed in the future?

#